The crash killed Rima, 38, Issam Abbas, 42, and their children: Ali, 13, Isabelle, 12, and Giselle, 7. The driver, Joey Lee Bailey of Georgetown, Kentucky, who also died in the crash, had a blood alcohol level nearly four times the legal limit, police said.
The vigil led by Mothers Against Drunk Driving — in addition to honoring the lives of the Abbas family and the more than 10,000 people killed in the U.S. annually by drunken drivers — was meant to push the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to adopt a rule mandating anti-drunken driving technology be equipped in all new vehicles.
Congress passed a law requiring such a rule three years ago and set a Nov. 15, 2024, deadline for the agency. That deadline came and went last week without action.
Taylor said she blames all parties involved for the persistence of drunken driving as a major killer on America’s roads. Of the roughly 40,000 traffic fatalities in the U.S. each year, drunken driving is responsible for about one-third of them.
“We don’t need to wait for NHTSA,” Taylor told The Detroit News. “The automakers can do this today. If they wanted, they could.”
Progress inches forward
After the Abbas family was killed, U.S. Rep. Debbie Dingell quickly became an advocate in Congress to prevent similar horrors.
She retold the story Tuesday of attending a memorial service for the Abbas family five years ago, recalling that young friends and classmates of the slain children ask how something like that could happen with so much technology inside modern-day cars and trucks.
“If kids can say this to me,” the Ann Arbor Democrat said, “as adults, we’ve got to do something. So we do, and we did. I came back and I called Ford Motor Co. — because they were in Dearborn — and I said, ‘This is our family. This is our community. We got to get this done.'”
Dingell sponsored the HALT Act, which required the Department of Transportation to prescribe a motor vehicle safety standard for mandatory, in-vehicle technology capable of passively detecting and stopping drunken or impaired driving. The measure was designed to be technology-neutral, meaning it would not require one particular type of vehicle addition to meet new safety standards.
The bill’s full title was the Honoring Abbas Family Legacy to Terminate Drunk Driving Act, which Taylor said in 2021 was a meaningful symbol that made sure her family’s “legacy gets to live on forever.”
Congress passed the act as part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law enacted in November 2021 under President Joe Biden. NHSTA, which operates within the Department of Transportation, made a preliminary regulatory filing in January 2024 seeking feedback from the public about the eventual standard it will set.
More: Out of Michigan family’s tragic death, new policy emerges to end drunken driving
The filing received more than 18,000 public comments but has not yet resulted in a standard that automakers will have to follow.
In response to an inquiry from The News, NHTSA said it does not expect to issue a final rule this year. If necessary, it can extend the time period for the final rule for three years but must provide annual status reports to Congress in the meantime.
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation — the top automotive lobbying group in Washington — announced Monday it would establish a new consortium of automakers and other businesses to pool resources and fund studies related to questions raised by public comments earlier in the year.
“Automakers are making major investments in research, development and testing of drunk and impaired driving technology using sensors, cameras and warning systems. But anytime the government requires vehicle technology, important questions should be asked. Like how does this technology work in the real world?” said John Bozzella, president and CEO of the alliance.
“Answering those questions is essential. Otherwise, the technology may be rejected by drivers,” Bozzella added. “That’s a result nobody wants. Our research consortium will help NHTSA fill those knowledge gaps.”